THE TRUST CENTRE / FOR COUNSEL AND THE BOARD
Every decision, owned.
Every owner, evidenced.
Governance is not a document written after the build. It is a set of decisions, each with a person who owns it and the evidence it leaves behind. Here are the decisions, the owners we usually see and a record you can take a decision through yourself.
THE ACCOUNTABILITY REGISTER
Twelve decisions.
One owner each.
A responsible AI programme is a set of decisions somebody has to own. These are the ones we work through with every client, who usually owns each, and the evidence each one leaves behind. Adapt it to your organisation; the structure is the point.
Choose the use case
Is this a problem worth solving, and how will we know it worked?
OwnerChief executive- A problem statement
- Success criteria and a baseline
- A named owner
- Reviewed by
- Finance, the process owner
- Revisit
- At the end of every stage.
- Where the platform helps
- This decision belongs to people. The platform keeps the record.Available today
Decide what data is used
Which data does it need, on what basis, and where does it stay?
OwnerGeneral counsel- A data map for the scope
- The basis for each use
- The agreed boundary
- Reviewed by
- Privacy, Security
- Revisit
- When a source or purpose changes.
- Where the platform helps
- Lumen Intelligence Personal data stays in the appliance; a privacy gateway pseudonymises values before model calls.Available today
Consult the people affected
Have the people whose work is captured, and their representatives, agreed to it?
OwnerPeople and HR- A consultation record
- Consent where it is required
- What is captured, and who sees it
- Reviewed by
- Employee representatives, Privacy
- Revisit
- Before anything new is captured.
- Where the platform helps
- This decision belongs to people. The platform keeps the record.Agreed with you
Classify the use under the law
What is our role, and which obligations follow from it?
OwnerGeneral counsel- A use-case description
- The role assessment
- The obligations that follow
- Reviewed by
- Compliance, the process owner
- Revisit
- When the use, the users or the law changes.
- Where the platform helps
- This decision belongs to people. The platform keeps the record.Agreed with you
Choose the model and provider
Which model, from whom, on what terms, and how did it perform on our examples?
OwnerChief information officer- Evaluation results on representative examples
- The provider’s terms
- The route and its fallback
- Reviewed by
- Security, Procurement
- Revisit
- When a provider or model changes.
- Where the platform helps
- Bridge Routes requests to suited models and compares evaluation results before a release.Available today
Grant access to agents
What may each agent see and do, and who owns it?
OwnerChief information security officer- An identity map with owners
- The policy for each action
- Allowed and denied decisions, explained
- Reviewed by
- The process owner, Engineering
- Revisit
- Whenever an agent gains a tool or a source.
- Where the platform helps
- Mesh Maps agents, models, tools and non-human identities to owners and applies policy to their actions.Available today
Set the human review boundary
Which actions wait for a person, and which person?
OwnerChief executive- Review routes
- Approvals, with who gave them
- Exceptions and why
- Reviewed by
- The process owner, Risk
- Revisit
- After every incident, and at each review.
- Where the platform helps
- Mesh Routes sensitive operations for review and keeps the approval with the decision.Available today
Release to production
Did this version do better on our examples, and can we go back?
OwnerChief information officer- Evaluation comparison
- Release requirements checked
- A path back to the previous version
- Reviewed by
- The process owner, Security
- Revisit
- Every release.
- Where the platform helps
- Builder Evaluates workflows on representative examples before a version is published.Available today
Handle an incident
What happened, who was told, and what changed so it does not recur?
OwnerChief information security officer- An incident record
- The rollback taken
- Notifications made
- Reviewed by
- General counsel, the process owner
- Revisit
- After every incident.
- Where the platform helps
- Bridge Keeps a path back to a previous release and defines fallback behaviour.Agreed with you
Measure the value
Against the baseline, what changed, and was it worth the cost?
OwnerChief financial officer- The baseline
- The measured result
- The running cost
- Reviewed by
- The process owner, the executive sponsor
- Revisit
- At every stage review.
- Where the platform helps
- Signals Tracks a signal through the decision and the action it led to.Available today
Continue, expand or stop
Does the evidence support the next step, or should we stop here?
OwnerChief executive- The pilot review
- Open risks
- The decision, with reasons
- Reviewed by
- Finance, Risk, the people affected
- Revisit
- At the end of every stage.
- Where the platform helps
- This decision belongs to people. The platform keeps the record.Available today
Retire or hand back
Can our own team run it, or switch it off cleanly?
OwnerChief information officer- The handback record
- Access retired
- Export confirmed
- Reviewed by
- Procurement, Security
- Revisit
- Before the engagement ends.
- Where the platform helps
- This decision belongs to people. The platform keeps the record.Agreed with you
A register, not a compliance determination. It is a starting structure for your own programme, not legal advice; your counsel and your regulators decide what applies to you.
THE DECISION RECORD
A clear line
of accountability.
Take a decision through its life: proposed by its owner, reviewed, approved and recorded. Every step leaves a line. Every recorded decision links to the one before it, so the history cannot be quietly rewritten.
Choose the use case
Is this a problem worth solving, and how will we know it worked?
- Owner
- Chief executive
- Reviewers
- Finance, the process owner
- Evidence
- A problem statement (not checked yet)
- Success criteria and a baseline (not checked yet)
- A named owner (not checked yet)
- Revisit
- At the end of every stage.
- No history yet. The owner proposes first.
- Propose
- Review
- Approve
- Record
The evidence chain
Each recorded decision carries a fingerprint drawn from its own content and the record before it.
- Start of the register
Illustrative. This record lives in your browser tab and is not connected to any system.
FOR THE BOARD
Five questions to ask,
every quarter.
A register earns its keep when somebody reads it. These are the questions we would want a board to ask of any AI programme, ours included. Each should be answerable from the evidence the register already keeps.
- Which decisions did agents take this quarter, and which waited for a person?
- Which evaluations failed, and what did we change because of them?
- What would it take to leave our supplier today, and when did we last rehearse it?
- Which use cases changed scope, data or users, and were they reassessed?
- Where did the value we measured differ from the value we expected, and why?
HOW TO READ THIS
What this register is,
and what it is not.
We would rather you knew the limits of this page than trusted it too far.
It is a structure.
The decisions, owners and evidence we work through with clients. Your organisation will name different owners and add decisions of its own.
It is not a compliance determination.
Nothing here says a use case is lawful, low risk or complete. Roles and obligations under the EU AI Act, data protection law and your sector are worked through in discovery; your counsel decides.
We have an interest.
We sell the products named in the register. Where one helps, its status says whether it is available today, in development or agreed with you. Ask to see it working.
ASK US DIRECTLY
Bring your own register.
We will fill in the evidence.
Start from your own programme and scope. We will show which decisions the platform supports today, which are still in development, and what we would agree with you in writing.
- The hard questionsEvery concern, by role, with an honest status.
- The value scenarioYour inputs, the formula, and the case that never pays back.
- Exit and handbackWhat you own, how to leave and what handback means.
- The accountability registerEvery decision, its owner and the evidence it leaves.
- Security and governanceThe data boundary, identity, controls and evidence.
- Our approachThe stages of an engagement and what each produces.